Monday, April 21, 2014

The Exposition and Invitation of Moonrise Kingdom: a Sequence Analysis

Normally, films have a set pattern through which they move to a new area or person; they begin far from the item of interest and gradually close in. The beginning of Moonrise Kingdom, however, moves from a close up of a painting inside of Suzy Bishop’s (Kara Hayward) home to a very long establishing shot outside. The interesting thing about the way Wes Anderson (director) initially leads us through the house, though, is that he has the camera move directly through the walls in a series of dolly shots that makes the house appear as if it were one long corridor. The composition of the house reminded me of the linear arrangement of props onstage, and I think Anderson intentionally gave the first few minutes of Moonrise Kingdom a metaphysical quality to establish its overall fictitiousness.

Anderson very deftly accomplishes a great deal of exposition at the beginning of Moonrise Kingdom by using several techniques of mise en scene such as composition, camera proxemics, and character placement as well as movement and sound. The unconventionality of the first several shots prepares the audience for the strangeness of Suzy and Sam Shukusky (Jared Gilman) as well as the quirkiness of the overall film.

A stationary shot at a little below eye-level introduces us to Suzy wearing her red checkered frock and white stockings she sports for the rest of the film. The girl serves as the dominant contrast in this shot because of her motion, but her binoculars, situated in the middle of the foreground, are the most emphasized object in the room. Throughout Moonrise Kingdom, Anderson includes numerous shots where Suzy looks directly at the camera through her binoculars, underscoring her desire to see exotic places and new things while she disregards reality. During the shot, Suzy walks down the stairs and moves toward the camera, but she doesn’t stop far enough away for us to get a good look at her; rather she pauses just where her head is out of frame before putting her cat on the table and picking up her binoculars. The movement introduces us to two of Suzy’s favorite things. By having Suzy place the cat in the foreground at the end of that shot, Anderson puts special emphasis on the creature, since Suzy packs tons of cat food for her trip in order to feed her pet but takes no food for herself.

Almost every shot in Moonrise Kingdom uses deep-focus, including this one, which allows us to see several key details in the background that serve as bits of foreshadowing and character development. For example, in the lower right corner of the room, a yellow suitcase sits beside a table piled with books. Later in the film, we see Suzy unpack far too many of her books from that same suitcase, a detail that clearly shows what the girl values. Also, near the bottom left corner of the door frame there is a picture of a bird which prefigures the scene where Suzy meets Sam in her raven costume. Furthermore, the bird picture in this shot emphasizes the theme of liberation and freedom that pervades much of Moonrise Kingdom.

During the film’s exposition, a record plays that explains the orchestral breakdown of a piece of music. Anderson is further emphasizing the set-up quality of the film; he wants us to see and hear a preparation as he prepares Moonrise Kingdom for us. As Suzy comes down the stairs and walks towards the table, the recording says “these smaller pieces are called variations, which means different ways of playing the same tune.” The word “variations” has a few implications for Suzy. First, she’s unconventional and puts a variation on the idea of the little rich girl. However, Suzy also has very severe mood swings as we see later on during the montage in which she and Sam exchange letters. This shot functions as a very informative but brief explanation of Suzy’s character and very subtly lays out what we can expect from her throughout the film.

Beginning slightly below eye-level as before, the next shot shows Suzy’s three brothers sitting together on the floor of their gender-divided room. The left side contains stacks of board games while the right has more girlish things like pink furniture and boxes, making the room appear equally split between Suzy and her brothers. However, when Suzy enters from the left, she sits on the window seat directly above her siblings, giving her a much more powerful appearance. Later in Moonrise Kingdom, Anderson shows us the extent of Suzy’s authority, such as when she sends the khaki scouts fleeing from the woods after stabbing one of them with her handy scissors. I think that in this shot, Anderson is playing around a bit with composition, for the fan-like arrangement of Suzy’s brothers as well as their attire resembles the style of realist French paintings. The perfect symmetry of the shot and the balance between the boys’ cool-colored clothes in the lower half of the frame and Suzy’s warm-colored ones in the top half make for a beautiful image. I think that some of the purpose for this shot has to do with simple aesthetics.

As a punch-in of the previous shot, the frame is positioned very close to Suzy’s profile while she reads one of her fantasy books, Shelby and the Secret Universe. Suzy’s position makes the audience feel as if they were infringing upon her reading or invading upon her private time. Also, the attentiveness with which Suzy reads shows in the way she holds her book – directly before her eyes like she’s attempting to block out everything else – and the close up makes her reading appear much more important. With the camera closer to the girl, the audience is better able to connect with her and understand the significance of her reading. When Suzy picks up her book in the previous shot, we hear the record player say, “Here is Cursill’s theme played by the whole orchestra together,” and immediately when this shot begins, the music starts. Anderson uses the orchestra’s tune to make an auditory transition from the real world to Suzy’s fantasy one. The shift indicates Suzy’s eagerness to indulge in fabrication rather than actuality.

For the first time, we see Suzy look directly at the camera through her binoculars, emphasizing how desperately she wants to see the world in a different, more fantastic light. Starting out in a stationary eye-level shot once again, the camera begins to zoom out and reveals a frame-inside-a-frame with Suzy bordered by her window, making her look trapped and miniscule. The image reflects Suzy’s own feelings towards her smothering home and with her boring life. Pulling back even further, the camera gradually makes Suzy less and less significant, taking her power away in order to prepare us for the introduction to her home and parents. Once pulled completely back, the camera stops a bit too far from Suzy’s gorgeous, red, naval-styled home and the words “Moonrise Kingdom” pop up in yellow, cursive handwriting on the screen before flashing several different colors. I think that Anderson includes a touch of irony here in that even though Suzy’s home is beautiful, the low-key lighting of the shot paired with the greyness of the sky in the background and the dark expanse of water in the foreground diminishes its attractiveness by framing it between different shades of grey, making us sympathize with Suzy’s feelings of loneliness, enclosure, and ennui. Also, the title “Moonrise Kingdom” sounds so bizarre and exciting but in reality the island of New Penzance is quite ordinary (until, of course, Sam and Suzy make their escape).

In the previous shots, the music from the recording functioned as diegetic sound, emanating from the small record player one of Suzy’s brothers turned on. However, in this shot, the music switches from diegetic to non-diegetic sound and thereby brings us more into the story. Also, the auditory shift marks the transition from the inside of the Bishop’s house to the outside where Suzy wants to be, so the music’s more realistic sound emphasizes the girl’s desire to “fly the coop.” A menacing thunderclap punctuates the end of the orchestral song, suggesting that Suzy’s perception of her pathetic life may not be very far-fetched from reality. On a more metaphysical level, however, by having Suzy break frame and the music become non-diegetic, Anderson makes us feel like he’s presenting Moonrise Kingdom to us as a story rather than simply disregarding its immediate connection to the viewer.

Anderson gives us another shot of Suzy’s brothers arranged in their fan-shape. This time, however, the one in the center plays jacks while the other two neutrally watch with their hands on the sides of their faces. The shot mimics the one just a few moments before in the playroom, showing Suzy’s mundane perception (and quite possibly the actuality) of her life. Next, the camera bypasses two rooms side by side; Laura Bishop’s (Frances McDormand) on the left and Walt Bishop’s (Bill Murray) on the right. As a cinema convention, left usually heralds wrong-doing or error while right suggests correctness, a practice that follows in this shot, for Mrs. Bishop is having an affair unbeknownst to her husband, Mr. Bishop. Laura’s infidelity is emphasized in this shot by her posture; bare legs propped up on her table and curlers in her hair while she messes with her nails. She appears entirely focused on her appearance. Even though Laura and Walt are facing each other, Anderson clearly creates a division between the couple by literally putting a wall between them. On the other side of the divide, Walt plays the practical husband, reading the paper and unconcerned with much else.

Once we return to the inside of the Bishop’s home, the non-diegetic sound of the record switches to semi-diegetic because it again reverts to its record-like sound quality but remains at a constant volume as the camera moves through the home, indicating that its source cannot be onscreen. The switch back to unimpressive, subdued music within Suzy’s house further emphasizes her tedium with her family, which we see again at the end of this shot as she stares at us through her binoculars. When the camera reaches Suzy’s parents, the recording says, “First we hear the woodwind family; the flutes, the oboes, the clarinets, and the bassoons.” The breakdown of orchestral components parallels Anderson’s breakdown of the different characters in Moonrise Kingdom.

The deep-focus used in this shot shows the numerous piles of books in the foreground, which we later learn are due to Suzy’s parent’s occupations as lawyers. As in the other shots thus far, only small, warm lights provide illumination for the image, making the house appear homier and more inviting in order to establish the contented façade that Suzy’s parents maintain. Also, in the far plane of the background, the windows show the greyness of the weather outside that makes for an unhappy and dissatisfied envelope around the seemingly functional family atmosphere within. The camera moves through a hallway to provide another bit of foreshadowing by giving the audience a brief look at the bike that Mrs. Bishop uses when she goes to see Captain Sharp (Bruce Willis), the man with whom she is having an affair.

Finally, the camera stops on Suzy looking through her binoculars again, as if she were observing the introduction of her family alongside the audience. Most films are very one-sided rather than interactive, for they pretend the audience doesn’t exist so as to make everything in the film revolve around the story and the characters. However in Moonrise Kingdom's opening sequence, Anderson suggests that the film needs the input and attention of its audience. He deliberately acknowledges us in a raconteur-like fashion during the Bishop family’s exposition by having Suzy repeatedly break frame.

The way Anderson manipulates sound as a transitional technique, the linear, non-impeded camera movement, and the descriptive mise en scène indicates to us that he is building the necessary exposition for Moonrise Kingdom much like plays present the needed backstory before they begin. His use of long, sweeping pans through the Bishop’s uncommonly long hallways reminds me of how props are cleared off stage during theatrical productions, especially since each lateral pan shows us new series of rooms or sets in the film. By “setting the stage” for his audience, Anderson doesn’t throw the bizarre world of Moonrise Kingdom at us; he invites us to watch.

--written by Morgan Honaker, a filmmaker living in Austin, Texas

Saturday, April 19, 2014

real enemy links

---Jean-Pierre Leaud auditions

---Sheila O'Malley and Dana Stevens appreciate National Velvet

---10 of the best cinematographers working today

---a promo reel for Doctor Strangelove

---"There is the belief, he said, 'that we have created in the National Security Agency this monster bureaucracy that's reading everybody's mail, listening to everybody's phone calls, infringing upon our civil liberties and civil rights. Hogwash.'"

---Elements of the Essay Film

---"How Hollywood Killed Death" by Alexander Huls

---A Jim Jarmusch Mixtape" by Calum Marsh

---"Very little truthfulness anywhere, antagonism everywhere, so much calculated to disgust, the gigantic hypocrisies, no holding fierce passions at bay, the ordinary viciousness you can see just by pressing the remote, explosive weapons in the hands of creeps, the gloomy tabulation of unspeakable violent events, the unceasing despoliation of the biosphere for profit, surveillance overkill that will come back to haunt us, great concentrations of wealth financing the most undemocratic malevolents around, science illiterates still fighting the Scopes trial 89 years on, economic inequities the size of the Ritz, indebtedness on everyone’s tail, families not knowing how bad things can get, money being squeezed out of every last thing — that frenzy — and (by no means new) government hardly by the people through representative democracy but rather by the great financial interests, the old American plutocracy worse than ever." --Philip Roth

---13 Wes Anderson commercials

---Johnny Cash on the Gospel

---David Cronenberg: Virtual Exhibition

---concerning James Baldwin's The Devil Finds Work

---“[Nicolas Cage is] the only actor since Marlon Brando that’s actually done anything new with the art of acting; he’s successfully taken us away from an obsession with naturalism into a kind of presentation style of acting that I imagine was popular with the old troubadours. If I could erase his bottom half bad movies, and only keep his top half movies, he would blow everyone else out of the water.” --Ethan Hawke

---Pablo Ferro: A Career Retrospective, Part 1

---an analysis of the last battle scene in Kurosawa's Seven Samurai

---trailers for Chef, Fed Up, A Most Wanted Man, Two Days, One Night, Gone GirlLucyand Captives

---Bush and the undead Iraqi child

---"There are clear reasons why this sort of story is appealing. The complete collapse of the narrative of what a secure future looks like for today’s young people and the grim messages about what the teenagers who grew up with Occupy and austerity have to look forward to as the planet heats up, the job market stutters, pension provision is depleted and the police get meaner have fostered a generational anxiety about how to cope with overmighty state power. These stories function both as manifesto and pressure release valve. They are escapist only in that they allow for the possibility of resistance. The message of The Hunger Games, like the message of The Bone Season, could not be starker: however much they make you fight one another, you must always 'remember who the real enemy is.'"  --Laurie Penny

---Sneaky Sugar

---a key to After Hours

---the influence of Chris Marker

---Bambi Vs. Godzilla

---"Speed is of the essence in the online world but faced with the Aladdin’s cave of cultural riches, one’s response is invariably one of sluggishness, of planning for a putative future that will never come. You become as dynamic as the Lotus Eaters blissfully wasted on the beach. Your attention span collapses alarmingly" --Oliver Farry

---"The Ballad of Geechie and Elvie" by John Jeremiah Sullivan

Saturday, April 5, 2014

Nostalgia in the Smithsonian exhibit: 4 notes on Captain America: The Winter Soldier

1) While it has fun fight scenes, Captain America: The Winter Soldier suffers from the peculiar inadequacies of a character being frozen for 65 years and then waking up in contemporary America. Much of the iconographic World War II propagandistic Rocketeer-like 1940s mise en scene which made Captain America: The First Avenger (2011) compelling to me has now disappeared, to be replaced with Robert Redford, metallic blues and grays, the smoggy streets of bureaucratic Washington DC, and much military hardware (fighter jets and Helicarriers) that will eventually provide the requisite explosions, crashing metal, and firepower for the movie's climax. In case that proves inadequate, the filmmakers include Scarlett Johansson a.k.a. Natasha Romanoff as Black Widow (in an Emma Peel leather get-up and straightened red hair) who knocks out enemies with a plethora of martial arts skills as she gives (in a sisterly chaste way) romantic advice to Cap (Chris Evans) who, meanwhile, appears too wholesome, noble, shy, and bulbous with upper body strength to get anywhere with contemporary women.

2) To make him more sympathetic, every superhero must begin his most recent sequel with angst, so Captain America broods about America's current oppressive foreign policy as explained by Nick Fury (Samuel L. Jackson). Nick points out that, nowadays, threats are neutralized before "they even happen." When Cap counters with the idea that "punishment" should come "after the crime," Fury replies "S.H.I.E.L.D. takes the world as it is, not as we would like it to be." Thereafter, Cap rides around on his motorcycle, fights French terrorists who have taken over a large ship, throws his shield around in a Frisbee-like manner, boomeranging it off of fighter jets in a way that sadly reminded me of Thor's stupid hammer. Cap's not sure if he can get behind S.H.I.E.L.D.'s NSA-esque surveillance techniques, and who can blame him? He's a bit bland. He hasn't really got the option of turning emo like Peter Parker does in Spider-Man 3 (2007), so Cap takes to haunting his Smithsonian historical exhibit for a small taste of his former 1940s world. Thus, in a sense, the sequel gazes nostalgically at its predecessor now reduced to museum aesthetics, patriotic images of noble soldiers mounted on a wall with video playback. The more time we spend with Cap, the more we wonder: what is Cap to do with his uber-patriotic heroic charmingly innocent but otherwise blank self except run really fast around the National Mall of Washington DC?

3) Captain America: The Winter Soldier ultimately oppressed me with its foreshadowing of all of the loud machine-tooled blockbuster sequels to come this spring and summer. Penetrate a secret bunker, handily discover a secret organization, dodge the fireball of a rocket attack from multiple jets, learn that a major figure that we thought was good is secretly bad and mean, evade machine gun fire, fake a death, resurrect an unconscionable amount of characters from the previous film (otherwise you'd have to invent new ones), vaguely flirt with Black Widow (who takes an interest out of contractual obligations), make a jokey reference to Iron Man, hook the shield to the back of one's jacket, determine once again to save the free world from familiar enemies, make laconic remarks with humorous flying sidekick, jump off of buildings and cargo jets, and fight the masked enemy that has some secret connection to your backstory.

4) As the movie went on, I discovered an unexpected buildup of wax in my left ear as I contemplated in a bemused way the many repetitions of this highly profitable but (with the exception of Joss Whedon's The Avengers) increasingly bankrupt franchise, a system of spectacles wherein men fight mano a mano with cute accessories as they fly around falling, flaming Helicarriers over and over, ad Marvel infinitum. Cap could've been talking about the anxieties of studio executives playing it safe when he said "This isn't freedom. This is fear."

Saturday, March 29, 2014

strike zone links

---"Simple and Sure"

---"Form is not just an academic side dish to the main course of content.  We critics of film and TV have a duty to help viewers understand how form and and content interact, and how content is expressed through form. The film or TV critic who refuses to write about form in any serious way abdicates that duty, and abets visual illiteracy." --Matt Zoller Seitz

---True Detective

---"Where to find film work"

---Leigh Brackett's screenplay for Altman's The Long Goodbye

---"Men have the advantage of a much longer shelf life not defined by their looks: as they age into masculine authority in their forties and the decades beyond, still making love to scads of constantly replenished sweet ingénues in their twenties and thirties, women age out, with few exceptions. Sixtyish character actress Meryl Streep remains eminently bankable because she’s an Oscar perennial. But she is also an anomaly.

Foreign countries nurture far more world-class women directors—New Zealand’s Campion, Denmark’s Susanne Bier, Poland’s Agnieszka Holland, and France’s Agnès Varda and Anne Fontaine, to name just a handful—but their films command relatively small budgets. More men move on from film schools to direct films than do women, who tend to wind up in lower-budget indie and television production. Many talented women serve the visions of their male bosses, as did the late production designer and producer Polly Platt, with Peter Bogdanovich and James L. Brooks.

In Hollywood, the barriers remain incredibly high for women hoping to direct, unlike the music or publishing industries where it’s relatively easy for exploitable talent to show what it can do. Men are permitted a few mistakes, where women are not. Movie stars Barbra Streisand and Angelina Jolie did not earn much respect for their directing on Yentl and In the Land of Blood and Honey, respectively. The list is long of women who have directed one or two films. Women directors with bona fide big-budget movie careers like Ron Howard or Barry Levinson? Rare."  --Anne Thompson

---"A good director, says Farber, is always 'seeking the idea in the visual world of action and movement, which is the more suitable, and so more emotionally vital, manner for the movies.'"

---Wes Anderson Centered

---trailers for Jupiter Ascending, Hercules, X-Men: Days of Future Past, and Begin Again

---filmmaking tips from Lars Von Trier

---"I probably am the most uniquely American director in the world. Me and Clint Eastwood. And that's the truth." --Harmony Korine

---The Motion Picture Camera: Past, Present and Future

---les Cahiers du Cinema on screen

---21 cinematographers share their favorite shots

---"I'm not letting critics off the hook. You're a critic because you should be able to spot it. You know, you're not a critic just for your opinion. My elevator man has got an opinion. Theoretically, you know movies enough technically so that you can recognize what lenses are being used, so that you can recognize a color palette. The color palette in The Verdict is wonderful and so carefully worked out. You know the color blue appears only once in that movie? I couldn't get the sky out of the shot. And I looked for a way to change the lens, but I needed that lens for another reason. But that kind of control on a movie is what my work is about."  --Sidney Lumet

---fake Criterions

---who stole my ads?

---3 reasons: Persona

---the animations of Monty Python's Flying Circus

---Anne Helen Petersen on leaving academia for Buzzfeed

---a history of the anthology film by Calum Marsh

---"If Gregor occasionally hits a wedding party and makes another family even more miserable than his own, the US government’s all-but-explicit explanation will be that guilt is never to be doubted. There is no word more frequently misused than “kafkaesque,” but it is hard to think of a more appropriate word for much of the language that the United States used to justify the War on Terror. According to The New York Times, for example, the US government 'in effect counts all military-age males in a strike zone as combatants […] unless there is explicit intelligence posthumously proving them innocent.' In other words, they are guilty for the most kafkaesque reason of all: because they are being punished. They can only save themselves by way of their own destruction, which sounds like just the sort of miniscule and pointless hope that would send a Kafka character madly scurrying about (if that Kafka character were on the wrong side of the monitor). So let’s hope for Gregor’s sake that he would be on the right side of the monitor: a non-person in a non-place control room somewhere in the United States." --David Burr Gerrard

---Jason Schwartzman auditions for Rushmore

Wednesday, March 26, 2014

Darknet

Facebook is the cruelest content generator, linking
Pageload activity out of simulated twitter feeds, trending
Search engines with the attention economy, streaming
Keyword addresses with hypertext protocol.
Data kept us warm, following
Spoilers in encrypted cookies, geotagging
A little spam with login approvals.
Tumblr surprised us, processing pixel tags over Instagram.
With a mention of a domain, we favorited the instant personalization,
And bookmarked the password into more shareworthy
And browsed Buzzfeed firmware, full-screen chatting about hyperspace identity.

Unreal comment feed.
My iPhone battery is empty,
And no one liked my recent Facebook status update.
With my perfect 0% rating on Rotten tomatoes,
I had to buy all of my Instagram followers.
The NSA does not even track or record the sites I visit.

All of human interaction now is downloadable public relations,
The marketing of the insufficiently famous and their family photos
For the profit of Jesse Eisenberg's simulacrum of Mark Zuckerberg.
Let me take a selfie.
(Stand beside me as I take this selfie.)
Can you smile for this selfie?
And I will show you something more than your
MacBook Pro booting up in the morning,
Or your MacBook Pro logging off at night.
I will show you starvation for attention in a handful of pixels.

Unreal teaser trailer.
I did not know than an epic fail had undone so many.
They said California is the place you ought to be.
Everybody's working for the weekend.
Everybody needs a new romance,
'Til the one day when the lady met this fellow,
The tiny ship was tossed,
And they knew that it was much more than a hunch,
If not for the courage of the fearless crew,
Oil that is, black gold, peak Texas tea,
The Minnow would be lost,
The Minnow would be lost.

Oh Lord, I am not worthy,
But text the word only
And Google will auto-correct it in Silicon Valley.

Do you have no followers, no incoming traffic?
When you scroll around, do you track nothing?
Do you post nothing? What do you post?

"I think we are in MySpace where the virtual dead have allowed their passwords to lapse."

People become brands and brands become logos,
Which become defaced graffiti,
Their links and grievances quickly forgotten in the prevailing white noise
Of trolls, GIFs, cat videos, avatars, and reality shows,
Insofar as anyone can sustain attention towards anything
Before they recheck their cell phone for hours and months of empty time,
(Just a sec, let me just check, hold on a minute),
Occupying a perpetual present, suspended, waiting
For a reaction from a Twitterbot
Or a text reply that never arrives.

Sunday, March 23, 2014

"The slaughter to come is probably beyond our imagining": a debate about the pleasures of The Counselor

After so much critical negativity, I found Ridley Scott's The Counselor to be delightful trashy fun with an almost endearing drug cartel. Predatory, Darwinian, casually vicious, what Oliver Stone's Savages (2012) wanted to be but wasn't due to studio compromises, The Counselor squares with my take on reality as infinitely remorseless without any opportunity for absolution, a place where even the affluent can quickly be reduced to garbage, the hunter is more compelling aesthetically than the victim, the spike in population growth will reach a critical mass, and, as Malkina (Cameron Diaz) cheerfully points out: "the slaughter to come is probably beyond our imagining."

And yet, the naysaying critics kept me from seeing the movie in the theatre, and only a residual affection for Cormac McCarthy's novels got me to see the movie on Blu-ray. To reflect those critics, I have a friend named W, the kind of guy who can recite chapter and verse the Rotten Tomatoes rating of every new release. As he says, "When you see the trailer for The Counselor, and you see all of these high level power players involved, with maybe the exception of Cameron Diaz. Actors, director, writer--everyone has great prestige, but then you watch the movie, it just doesn't live up to that potential even remotely, and because of that, critics just went "Wha? Wha?" They were confused, and they probably reacted more harshly than the movie warrants, but now you're watching it with such low expectations. So, you will approach it with a different mindset, especially since it is not a completely terrible film. I would say it's about half-good."

FD: For a sad person who has internalized all of this negative criticism, you just . . . fell into that.

W: No, I actively hated the first 30 minutes. I was like 'What the hell is this? What are the words that are coming out of their mouths?' As soon as Brad Pitt showed up and said, in so many words, we're all gonna die, I immediately liked the movie better. He sets up the latter half of the film in such a cynical way, I appreciated it, and when everything (spoiler alert) goes down hill, I thought that was kind of fun, but, I still didn't care about any of the characters.

FD: You have been suckered by all of the naysayers into not liking this modern-day trashy masterpiece. The End.

W: I would say the fundamental problem with the film is the script.

FD: HA!!

W: In terms of the construction of plot elements, it is perfectly fine, but in terms of character development, there are scenes that are handled so clumsily, and without any restraint of subtlety, that it comes off as barely watchable.

FD: Give me an example.

W: Cameron Diaz has some really stupid lines such as "Truth has no temperature." What does that mean?

FD: It's very cold. It's a very cold movie.

W: Duh. Why does she have to phrase it in such a flowery stupid way? There are these tangential moments that are either laughable, bad, or they progress the plot. I did enjoy those moments where Brad Pitt (who plays Westray) makes allusions to other weird things like snuff films.

FD: The snuff film reference prepares the viewer for a key scene late in the movie.

W: Most of the time, the movie is almost unintelligible. There are moments with Javier Bardem (Reiner) and some Hungarian guy talking, and I can't follow what they're saying.

FD: What scene are we talking about?

W: The scene with a Hungarian man and Michael Fassbender (who plays the counselor).

FD: They are in Amsterdam, and they are discussing the diamond that the counselor is thinking of buying for Laura (Penelope Cruz). That sets up a scene later when Malkina knows everything about the diamond just by looking at it. Meanwhile, Laura, as one of the "faint of heart" who will bring us to the "edge of ruin," does not know anything about the diamond except that its pretty. The diamond motif develops new meanings until the very last scene in the movie. McCarthy explores how every character creates his or her own reality, and Laura shows how she's just not aware. As Malkina points out, "What a world." Laura replies, "Do you think the world is strange?" And Malkina says, "I was talking about yours."

W: What is the point of the old man, though? It all seems thoroughly pointless.

FD: You just don't understand. Therefore, you don't like it.

W: I understand.

FD: You didn't even want to watch the beginning again on Blu-ray. You just want to judge it.

W: The film is at its best when no one is talking.

FD: ?!?!? What about the great scene later on when the counselor talks to the jefe, or the leader of the Cartel?

W: It's a beautiful scene, but it goes on way too long.

FD: People talk all of the time in Godard films. People talk all of the time in Tarantino films! There's nothing wrong with talk in a movie that works. You are saying that you just don't understand.

W: All of McCarthy's work so far has a philosophical edge to it. You look at the survivalism of The Road (2009) and the unbridled evil of No Country for Old Men (2007) and how the old cannot really contain the new evil.

FD: Right. You could say that's true for the drug cartel too, and they are pleasantly efficiently evil.

W: But it's so trashy. With The Counselor, McCarthy is trying to have his cake and eat it too. He's trying to make a typical fun noir thriller, but he's also trying to have all of these layers: quotes, references, allusions, and tangential connections, and you can't do both.

FD: A lot of great films are trashy yet serious at the same time: The Third Man, Psycho, Silence of the Lambs. People go back and reconsider. Those that were considered trash suddenly become the best films of the era.

W: All three of those films push the genre forward. The Counselor's overbearing Cosmopolis-like philosophical dialogue incoherently conflicts with its pulpier more fun action elements.

FD: I'm just saying that you don't understand.

W: You are just so wrong.

FD: On that note, we should probably stop before violence breaks out. Thanks for your thoughts.     

Thursday, March 13, 2014

digital canyon links

---1001 movies you must see (before you die)

---Between Two Ferns: Obama

---The Fox and Mr. Anderson

---"Critical Condition" by Kent Jones

---Richard Widmark

---"Cool Girls don’t have the hang-ups of normal girls: They don’t get bogged down by the patriarchy, or worrying about their weight. They’re basically dudes masquerading in beautiful women’s bodies, reaping the privileges of both. But let’s be clear: It’s a performance. It might not be a conscious one, but it’s the way our society implicitly instructs young women on how to be awesome: Be chill and don’t be a downer, act like a dude but look like a supermodel."  --Anne Helen Petersen

---the spaces of Her

---the end title sequence of The Lego Movie

---"It used to be you’d go into a restaurant and the owner would say, 'Do you mind if I take a picture of you and put it on my wall?' Sweet and simple. Now, everyone has a camera in their pocket. Add to that predatory photographers and predatory videographers who want to taunt you and catch you doing embarrassing things. . . You’re out there in a world where if you do make a mistake, it echoes in a digital canyon forever."  --Alec Baldwin

---"Putin will teach you how to love" by Pussy Riot

---Sunrise

---Scorsese's top 10

---There was a storied time when people really did take movies—and movie reviews—seriously, when the internecine struggles between Pauline Kael, Andrew Sarris, Stanley Kauffmann, and John Simon spilled out into arguments at countless bars and dinner parties. Not coincidentally, this relentless chattering, applauding and bickering coincided with a particularly brilliant period for American movies." --Malcolm Thorndike Nicholson

---"Elegy for a Country's Seasons" by Zadie Smith

---Liz Wahl quits

---"The Psychology of Begging to be Followed on Twitter"

---Three Reasons: Foreign Correspondent

---behind the scenes of The Grand Budapest Hotel 

---trailers for Stripped, Jupiter Ascending, Captain America: the Winter Soldier, Sin City: A Dame to Kill For

---"There’s a feeling in our culture that play, that creativity is almost demonic.  You need it to drive the engine, but it scares you.  You need to isolate it, put it someplace where it’s not that dangerous.  We have to isolate it from the political domain—any kind of imagination or sense of play or fun is only going to lead to the Gulag; any kind of transformative, visionary politics scares us.  Creativity is something that we obviously need, and we talk as if we like it all the time, but really we don’t. I find this in academia all the time.

Why do you go into an academic job, why do you become a scholar? It’s partly because it’s fun." --David Graeber